Q Speech Critique "Prisons in Norway" This is one of my favorite student speeches of all time. Alex was a criminal justice major and I begged and pleaded with him to change to Communication Studies to no avail. This is an informative speech not a demonstration speech, but it’s an excellent example of what I want your introduction, transitions, and conclusions to do. I want to focus on those three elements, although, as always, you may critique his delivery (volume, tone, rate, enunciation, eye contact, movement, etc.). In what way does Alex’ introduction satisfy audience needs for an effective introduction? How does he make an argument for an otherwise obscure topic to this audience of college students? How does his conclusion meet the audience’s need for a satisfying conclusion? Do you find his transitions to be effective? Why or why not? What might you recommend he do differently? Post your initial 250-word critique (10-points) and two follow-up postings (5-points each).